IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Pedersen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-11-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Litchfield/Dassel-Cokato High USHS-MN 25 18 19 37 1.480 0.1874 0.1847 0.3595 0.3543
2016-17 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 15 4 3 7 0.467 0.0898 0.0904 0.2943 0.2962
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 St. Olaf D1 MIAC JR 2 2 0 2 1.000
2020-21 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 2 2 0 2 1.000
2019-20 St. Olaf D1 MIAC SO 24 3 1 4 0.167
2019-20 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 24 3 1 4 0.167
2018-19 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#22873
Forward overall
#1039
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn Eliav
Neumann · 2023-24
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Costello
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Doner
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.