← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Whitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-06-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 33 1 9 10 0.303 0.0226 0.0223 0.0694 0.0686
2015-16 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 40 3 17 20 0.500 0.0372 0.0350 0.1145 0.1077
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Worcester State D1 SR 26 0 2 2 0.077
2019-20 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 26 0 2 2 0.077
2018-19 Worcester State D1 JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2018-19 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2017-18 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 13 0 1 1 0.077
2016-17 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 25 3 2 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2016-17 · Worcester State
+609.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21481
Defenseman overall
#2329
Defenseman born in 1995
#888
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2016-17
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.