← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mateo Capriotti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 39 7 21 28 0.718 0.2015 0.2033 0.5904 0.5958
2016-17 USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 7 11 18 0.419 0.1175 0.1129 0.3443 0.3307
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Nazareth D1 UCHC SR 11 2 0 2 0.182
2020-21 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 11 2 0 2 0.182
2019-20 Nazareth D1 UCHC JR 21 6 7 13 0.619
2019-20 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 21 6 7 13 0.619
2018-19 Nazareth D1 UCHC SO 24 6 0 6 0.250
2018-19 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 24 6 0 6 0.250
2017-18 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 20 0 5 5 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2017-18 · Nazareth
+95.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36371
Forward overall
#1570
Forward born in 1996
#142
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2004-05
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.