IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Zabrowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Elite 42 7 9 16 0.381 0.0352 0.0341 0.0872 0.0844
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 17 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 17 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 22 3 0 3 0.136
2018-19 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 22 3 0 3 0.136
2017-18 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 19 2 0 2 0.105
2016-17 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 9 0 2 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2016-17 · Worcester State
+661.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#54087
Forward overall
#2430
Forward born in 1995
#985
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Lun
UMass Boston · 2006-07
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Gwatkin
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trenton Yule
Canton · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.