IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trenton Yule Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-12-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kanata Stallions CCHL 36 4 8 12 0.333 0.0723 0.0683 0.2580 0.2438
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Canton D3 — SR 25 0 1 1 0.040
2016-17 Canton D3 — JR 24 2 6 8 0.333
2015-16 Canton D3 — SO 26 3 4 7 0.269
2014-15 Canton D3 — FR 24 1 5 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2014-15 · Canton
+287.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16006
Defenseman overall
#1661
Defenseman born in 1993
#1315
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Karavos
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Sardina
Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.