IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

D.J. Goldstein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 42 10 10 20 0.476 0.0355 0.0353 0.1091 0.1085
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 25 4 2 6 0.240
2018-19 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 23 5 4 9 0.391
2017-18 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 24 8 9 17 0.708
2016-17 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#50102
Forward overall
#2357
Forward born in 1996
#752
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bill McGinnis
New England College · 2005-06
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
McCabe Dvorak
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Rumsey
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.