IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Symonds Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 30 1 6 7 0.233 0.0652 0.0650 0.1610 0.1604
2015-16 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 54 4 9 13 0.241 0.0673 0.0633 0.1661 0.1563
2016-17 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 51 8 26 34 0.667 0.1863 0.1670 0.4601 0.4124
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 16 2 5 7 0.438
2018-19 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 23 1 7 8 0.348
2017-18 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 27 4 12 16 0.593
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2017-18 · Buffalo State
+400.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9729
Defenseman overall
#1476
Defenseman born in 1996
#3096
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Niko Happo
Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Bernhardson
Concordia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Minerva
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.