← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Blake Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Breck USHS-MN 26 5 20 25 0.962 0.1185 0.1185 0.2335 0.2335
2020-21 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 20 2 6 8 0.400 0.0442 0.0442 0.1263 0.1263
2021-22 Neepawa Titans MJHL 13 1 3 4 0.308 0.0592 0.0572 0.1939 0.1874
2022-23 Neepawa Titans MJHL 47 3 10 13 0.277 0.0532 0.0489 0.1743 0.1603
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC GR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 14 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17799
Defenseman overall
#3073
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.