IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Swanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 33 4 3 7 0.212 0.0637 0.0648 0.1747 0.1776
2016-17 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 17 17 34 0.773 0.2320 0.2245 0.6365 0.6160
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast GR 19 4 4 8 0.421
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 8 2 2 4 0.500
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 24 3 6 9 0.375
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 26 4 9 13 0.500
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 25 7 5 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2017-18 · Norwich
+249.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25556
Forward overall
#1084
Forward born in 1996
#135
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Keaney
Neumann · 2008-09
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Lison
Bowdoin · 2013-14
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ron Lindgren
Aurora · 2013-14
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.