← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Rodgers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 36 14 7 21 0.583 0.1637 0.1554 0.4796 0.4554
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Endicott D1 CNE SR 18 6 6 12 0.667
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE 18 6 6 12 0.667
2018-19 Endicott D1 CNE JR 22 8 6 14 0.636
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE 22 8 6 14 0.636
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE 21 6 6 12 0.571
2015-16 American International D1 AHA 30 1 1 2 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2015-16 · American International
-49.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34452
Forward overall
#1346
Forward born in 1994
#133
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2018-19
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2022-23
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.