IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corey Robertson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 25 6 5 11 0.440 0.1235 0.1234 0.3624 0.3622
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 23 3 2 5 0.217 0.0610 0.0580 0.1791 0.1703
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Trine D1 — SR 14 2 1 3 0.214
2020-21 Trine D3 NCHA SR 14 2 1 3 0.214
2019-20 Trine D1 — JR 23 6 11 17 0.739
2019-20 Trine D3 NCHA JR 23 6 11 17 0.739
2018-19 Trine D1 — SO 23 3 3 6 0.261
2018-19 Trine D3 NCHA SO 23 3 3 6 0.261
2017-18 Trine D3 NCHA FR 23 7 4 11 0.478
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2017-18 · Trine
+564.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#49527
Forward overall
#2314
Forward born in 1996
#248
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jackson Edwards
Castleton · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Golanowski
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Schmitt
Utica · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.