IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kai Kapossy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Elite 42 7 8 15 0.357 0.0428 0.0436 0.0820 0.0836
2016-17 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 37 7 6 13 0.351 0.1055 0.1043 0.2894 0.2861
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 UMass Dartmouth D3 — GR 25 9 11 20 0.800
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SR 3 2 2 4 1.333
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 28 9 7 16 0.571
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 26 5 9 14 0.538
2017-18 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 26 4 6 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2017-18 · UMass Dartmouth
+461.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43408
Forward overall
#2007
Forward born in 1996
#422
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nate Rogers
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wiggle Kerbrat
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Macdonald
Lebanon Valley · 2000-01
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.