IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Babbidge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Palm Beach Hawks USPHL-Elite 25 2 1 3 0.120 0.0111 0.0120 0.0275 0.0298
2015-16 Palm Beach Hawks USPHL-Elite 40 8 28 36 0.900 0.0831 0.0861 0.2061 0.2136
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 43 18 31 49 1.139 0.1052 0.1030 0.2609 0.2554
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Tufts D1 NESCAC JR 20 7 2 9 0.450
2019-20 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 20 7 2 9 0.450
2018-19 Tufts D1 NESCAC SO 14 1 1 2 0.143
2018-19 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 14 1 1 2 0.143
2017-18 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 22 4 4 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2017-18 · Tufts
+341.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37500
Forward overall
#1806
Forward born in 1997
#251
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will O'Neill
Worcester State · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Roe
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Stewart Sjoberg
Neumann · 2003-04
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.