IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Docherty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 53 8 8 16 0.302 0.0740 0.0755 0.2076 0.2118
2015-16 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 53 19 26 45 0.849 0.2081 0.2008 0.5839 0.5635
2016-17 — OJHL 37 12 20 32 0.865 0.2120 0.1951 0.5948 0.5474
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Cortland D1 — JR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2018-19 Cortland D1 — SO 20 3 1 4 0.200
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 20 3 1 4 0.200
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 16 3 2 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2017-18 · SUNY Cortland
+84.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25348
Forward overall
#1041
Forward born in 1996
#1184
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Corey Chakeen
UMass Boston · 2009-10
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Martin
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby Nichol
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.