IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Moss Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-07-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Express Hockey Club EHL 36 2 16 18 0.500 0.1759 0.1774 0.2452 0.2473
2016-17 Express Hockey Club EHL 40 3 23 26 0.650 0.2287 0.2203 0.3187 0.3070
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 5 0 3 3 0.600
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 21 0 5 5 0.238
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 24 2 7 9 0.375
2017-18 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 20 1 3 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2017-18 · Connecticut College
+4.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6246
Defenseman overall
#1104
Defenseman born in 1996
#773
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Cohen
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Anderson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian DiFelice
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.