← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Rose Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier-Classic 36 5 10 15 0.417 0.1170 0.1197 0.3432 0.3511
2016-17 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 42 13 18 31 0.738 0.2072 0.2019 0.6079 0.5922
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wesleyan D1 JR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2019-20 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2018-19 Wesleyan D1 SO 25 4 2 6 0.240
2018-19 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 25 4 2 6 0.240
2017-18 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 25 1 3 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2017-18 · Wesleyan
+10.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33142
Forward overall
#1411
Forward born in 1996
#120
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2016-17
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.