← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sheldon Shyiak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-03 Country: USA
Marian
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 St. Cloud USHS-MN 6 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 St. Cloud USHS-MN 20 3 4 7 0.350 0.0443 0.0443 0.0850 0.0850
2023-24 Dauphin Kings MJHL 30 1 5 6 0.200 0.0385 0.0392 0.1261 0.1286
2024-25 Dauphin Kings MJHL 48 2 8 10 0.208 0.0401 0.0387 0.1314 0.1267
2025-26 Dauphin Kings MJHL 47 4 9 13 0.277 0.0532 0.0488 0.1744 0.1599
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#54549
Forward overall
#3807
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

Marian Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Marian
0.00
actual FR PPG at Marian
0.00
actual FR PPG at Marian
0.26
actual FR PPG at Marian

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2014-15
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.