IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Araujo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 41 9 9 18 0.439 0.0642 0.0639 0.2152 0.2143
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 42 10 16 26 0.619 0.0906 0.0861 0.3035 0.2885
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wilkes D3 MAC — 22 4 12 16 0.727
2019-20 Wilkes D1 — JR 27 19 13 32 1.185
2019-20 Wilkes D3 MAC — 27 19 13 32 1.185
2018-19 Wilkes D1 — SO 26 11 17 28 1.077
2018-19 Wilkes D3 MAC — 26 11 17 28 1.077
2017-18 Nazareth D3 UCHC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#29442
Forward overall
#1222
Forward born in 1996
#914
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyson Kirkby
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Zalewski
Buffalo State · 2001-02
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Inderieden
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.