← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Kuipers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Jersey Rockets EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 27 2 1 3 0.111 0.0312 0.0310 0.0915 0.0909
2017-18 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 48 3 3 6 0.125 0.0697 0.0648 0.1011 0.0940
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wilkes D3 MAC SR 25 6 8 14 0.560
2020-21 Wilkes D1 JR 10 1 5 6 0.600
2020-21 Wilkes D3 MAC JR 10 1 5 6 0.600
2019-20 Wilkes D1 SO 28 2 10 12 0.429
2019-20 Wilkes D3 MAC SO 28 2 10 12 0.429
2018-19 Wilkes D1 FR 23 2 9 11 0.478
2018-19 Wilkes D3 MAC FR 23 2 9 11 0.478
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2018-19 · Wilkes
+989.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#56611
Forward overall
#3032
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2015-16
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2021-22
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.