← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Stevenson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-12-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 44 19 21 40 0.909 0.1189 0.1207 0.3085 0.3131
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 GR 31 10 22 32 1.032
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 19 9 18 27 1.421
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 JR 6 2 3 5 0.833
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 6 2 3 5 0.833
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 SO 32 17 20 37 1.156
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 32 17 20 37 1.156
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 FR 19 3 5 8 0.421
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 19 3 5 8 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2018-19 · Franklin Pierce
+307.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
92%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16128
Forward overall
#742
Forward born in 1998
#955
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2010-11
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2008-09
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.