← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Grinvalds Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-06-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 37 4 8 12 0.324 0.0299 0.0312 0.0743 0.0776
2016-17 EHL 42 0 4 4 0.095 0.0220 0.0223 0.0466 0.0472
2017-18 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 47 10 22 32 0.681 0.1573 0.1505 0.3332 0.3189
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 20 2 6 8 0.400
2020-21 Elmira D1 UCHC JR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Elmira D1 UCHC SO 16 1 3 4 0.250
2019-20 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 16 1 3 4 0.250
2018-19 Elmira D1 UCHC FR 25 2 2 4 0.160
2018-19 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 25 2 2 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2018-19 · Elmira
+70.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12814
Defenseman overall
#1962
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.