IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec Skar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Forest Lake High (MN) USHS-MN 25 6 5 11 0.440 0.1184 0.1148 0.1069 0.1037
2015-16 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 41 18 16 34 0.829 0.0999 0.1038 0.2620 0.2723
2016-17 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 35 8 19 27 0.771 0.0930 0.0919 0.2437 0.2409
2017-18 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 46 11 42 53 1.152 0.1388 0.1302 0.3640 0.3414
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 25 3 3 6 0.240
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 11 0 2 2 0.182
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 24 2 5 7 0.292
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10329
Defenseman overall
#1585
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Owen Watson
SUNY Potsdam · 2023-24
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Scott
Finlandia · 2010-11
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt McQuade
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.