← New Search ↗ Social Card

Theodore Austin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Toledo Cherokee NA3HL 45 1 3 4 0.089 0.0098 0.0111 0.0282 0.0319
2017-18 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 19 0 6 6 0.316 0.0685 0.0667 0.2445 0.2380
2018-19 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 61 4 17 21 0.344 0.0747 0.0694 0.2665 0.2475
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 28 1 13 14 0.500
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 26 2 14 16 0.615
2020-21 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 8 0 1 1 0.125
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 26 1 9 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2019-20 · Plymouth State
+496.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14772
Defenseman overall
#2300
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2009-10
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2011-12
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.