← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew McCormick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-09-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 44 2 9 11 0.250 0.0314 0.0329 0.0789 0.0825
2017-18 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 45 10 25 35 0.778 0.0976 0.0972 0.2456 0.2445
2018-19 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 47 15 29 44 0.936 0.1175 0.1108 0.2956 0.2787
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Westfield State D3 MASCAC 26 0 1 1 0.038
2021-22 Westfield State D3 MASCAC 26 0 2 2 0.077
2019-20 Westfield State D1 MASCAC FR 27 0 4 4 0.148
2019-20 Westfield State D3 MASCAC 27 0 4 4 0.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2019-20 · Westfield State
+48.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9157
Defenseman overall
#1687
Defenseman born in 1998
#1393
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2005-06
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.