← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Kassab Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Elite 41 8 6 14 0.342 0.0600 0.0647 0.0782 0.0843
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1173 0.1228 0.1634 0.1710
2017-18 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 33 5 12 17 0.515 0.1813 0.1797 0.2526 0.2503
2018-19 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 41 15 23 38 0.927 0.3261 0.3068 0.4544 0.4276
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 19 0 2 2 0.105
2021-22 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 16 3 0 3 0.188
2020-21 Lebanon Valley D1 SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lebanon Valley D1 FR 17 1 2 3 0.176
2019-20 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 17 1 2 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2019-20 · Lebanon Valley
-19.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18487
Forward overall
#866
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2017-18
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.