IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tom Yurisich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 36 1 11 12 0.333 0.0418 0.0431 0.1052 0.1085
2017-18 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 45 6 13 19 0.422 0.0530 0.0520 0.1333 0.1307
2018-19 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 45 10 37 47 1.044 0.1311 0.1217 0.3297 0.3060
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 18 1 2 3 0.167
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 18 1 2 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2019-20 · Lawrence
+88.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10076
Defenseman overall
#1783
Defenseman born in 1998
#1540
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Beckstead
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Anderson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salvatore Scalise
Concordia · 2017-18
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.