← New Search ↗ Social Card

Callum Jones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Oakville Blades OJHL 54 7 12 19 0.352 0.0863 0.0838 0.2409 0.2338
2018-19 Oakville Blades OJHL 54 3 23 26 0.481 0.1180 0.1087 0.3296 0.3037
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 27 2 1 3 0.111
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 23 2 4 6 0.261
2020-21 Norwich D1 SO 8 0 2 2 0.250
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 8 0 2 2 0.250
2019-20 Norwich D1 FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2019-20 · Norwich
+114.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13011
Defenseman overall
#2126
Defenseman born in 1998
#2662
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.