← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Banovetz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Dells Ducks USPHL-Elite 17 2 5 7 0.412 0.0307 0.0313 0.0943 0.0960
2017-18 Seahawks Hockey EHL 47 8 8 16 0.340 0.0498 0.0492 0.1667 0.1648
2018-19 Seahawks Hockey EHL 40 9 19 28 0.700 0.1025 0.0962 0.3429 0.3218
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 26 0 2 2 0.077
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 12 0 1 1 0.083
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 7 0 1 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2019-20 · Norwich
+95.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9221
Defenseman overall
#1688
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rivier · 2024-25
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.