IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nate Holm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Hastings High USHS-MN 25 5 4 9 0.360 0.0969 0.0986 0.0874 0.0889
2016-17 River Falls Renegades USPHL-Elite 28 8 10 18 0.643 0.0771 0.0801 0.1476 0.1533
2017-18 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 29 17 23 40 1.379 0.1857 0.1841 0.4695 0.4656
2018-19 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 41 26 30 56 1.366 0.1839 0.1726 0.4650 0.4364
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Finlandia D3 — SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Northland D3 — FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25981
Forward overall
#1079
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Spencer Flansburg
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Giacomin
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Turner
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.