IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Opie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-09-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHLP 35 2 9 11 0.314 0.0246 0.0248 0.0710 0.0717
2017-18 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 43 6 25 31 0.721 0.0869 0.0865 0.2277 0.2267
2018-19 — EHL 29 3 2 5 0.172 0.0370 0.0358 0.0844 0.0818
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 — SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 UMass Dartmouth D3 — JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21332
Defenseman overall
#2587
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Nachbaur
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Thornton
Castleton · 2012-13
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Bukowski
Augsburg · 2007-08
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.