IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 43 13 24 37 0.861 0.1988 0.1982 0.4210 0.4197
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Assumption D2 NE10 — 32 10 23 33 1.031
2022-23 Assumption D2 NE10 — 31 8 7 15 0.484
2021-22 Assumption D2 NE10 — 11 2 1 3 0.273
2019-20 Assumption D1 NE10 FR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Assumption D2 NE10 — 11 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16056
Forward overall
#761
Forward born in 1999
#264
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Muzyka
Skidmore · 2015-16
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Arias
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Trathen
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.