IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastian Vaillancourt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Hutchinson High USHS-MN 24 0 2 2 0.083 0.0103 0.0107 0.0202 0.0209
2017-18 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Premier 43 3 10 13 0.302 0.0341 0.0344 0.1026 0.1035
2018-19 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Premier 44 0 18 18 0.409 0.0461 0.0441 0.1389 0.1327
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 19 0 1 1 0.053
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17365
Defenseman overall
#2570
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Marit
Concordia (WI) · 2013-14
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Woodward
St. Mary's · 2005-06
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy DeFazio
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.