IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Alfieri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1226 0.1285 0.3443 0.3609
2016-17 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 50 6 10 16 0.320 0.0784 0.0787 0.2203 0.2210
2017-18 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 49 3 14 17 0.347 0.0850 0.0812 0.2388 0.2281
2018-19 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 46 5 9 14 0.304 0.0746 0.0676 0.2095 0.1899
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47657
Forward overall
#2603
Forward born in 1998
#3468
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Chilton
Aurora · 2017-18
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Horn
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Jacobs
Lawrence · 2010-11
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.