IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Rashotte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Wellington Dukes OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2002-03 Trenton Sting OJHL 44 12 10 22 0.500 0.1226 0.1226 0.3422 0.3422
2003-04 Trenton Sting OJHL 41 21 23 44 1.073 0.2630 0.2630 0.7346 0.7346
2004-05 Trenton Sting OJHL 48 23 22 45 0.938 0.2298 0.2298 0.6417 0.6417
2005-06 Kanata Stallions CCHL 49 13 13 26 0.531 0.1151 0.1151 0.4107 0.4107
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Lake Forest D3 — FR 7 1 0 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2006-07 · Lake Forest
+3.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22401
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Payne
Concordia · 2006-07
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Deiter Stange
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Dicarlo
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.