← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stone Stelzl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-10-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Dells Ducks USPHL-Premier 43 27 13 40 0.930 0.1217 0.1282 0.3157 0.3326
2018-19 Dells Ducks USPHL-Premier 42 18 25 43 1.024 0.1339 0.1340 0.3475 0.3477
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Castleton D3 LittleEast GR 24 0 2 2 0.083
2023-24 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 26 4 0 4 0.154
2022-23 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 26 5 2 7 0.269
2021-22 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 25 3 4 7 0.280
2020-21 Castleton D1 LittleEast FR 7 1 1 2 0.286
2020-21 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 7 1 1 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2020-21 · Castleton
+153.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13985
Forward overall
#643
Forward born in 1999
#764
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2017-18
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.