IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Spolec Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-12-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 24 6 7 13 0.542 0.0709 0.0755 0.1839 0.1958
2018-19 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 41 19 32 51 1.244 0.1627 0.1646 0.4222 0.4271
2019-20 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 32 19 31 50 1.562 0.2044 0.2044 0.5303 0.5303
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Olaf D1 MIAC FR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2020-21 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 2 0 1 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2020-21 · St. Olaf
+352.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9005
Forward overall
#396
Forward born in 1999
#361
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tory Allan
Norwich · 2007-08
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Edward Osowski
Becker · 2011-12
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Juron
SUNY Potsdam · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.