IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Pogue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 35 18 11 29 0.829 0.0916 0.0901 0.2625 0.2583
2019-20 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 36 12 19 31 0.861 0.0952 0.0952 0.2728 0.2728
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 11 1 1 2 0.182
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28895
Forward overall
#1515
Forward born in 1999
#997
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jayson Dobay
Utica · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawson MacDougall
Hobart · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Frazee
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.