IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trent Markley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 13 2 1 3 0.231 0.0290 0.0295 0.0729 0.0743
2018-19 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 41 1 6 7 0.171 0.0223 0.0217 0.0579 0.0563
2019-20 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 31 2 6 8 0.258 0.0338 0.0338 0.0876 0.0876
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Post D2 NE10 — 7 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Post D2 NE10 — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23135
Defenseman overall
#3295
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Murphy
Franklin Pierce · 2004-05
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Wilkins
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.115 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Williams
Norwich · 2017-18
0.345 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.