IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Schwartz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-10-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 46 7 9 16 0.348 0.0746 0.0801 0.1703 0.1828
2018-19 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 43 12 18 30 0.698 0.1497 0.1532 0.3417 0.3496
2019-20 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 46 14 17 31 0.674 0.1446 0.1446 0.3300 0.3300
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 30 8 13 21 0.700
2022-23 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 27 9 8 17 0.630
2021-22 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 26 10 15 25 0.962
2020-21 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31368
Forward overall
#1399
Forward born in 1999
#688
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Blake
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Bennett
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Timm
Finlandia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.