IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tucker Twardosky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Maine Wild NA3HL 47 7 10 17 0.362 0.0454 0.0488 0.1142 0.1228
2017-18 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Elite 43 18 34 52 1.209 0.1116 0.1093 0.2769 0.2712
2018-19 Connecticut Nighthawks USPHL-Premier 44 9 23 32 0.727 0.0951 0.0930 0.2468 0.2412
2019-20 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 45 12 18 30 0.667 0.1540 0.1540 0.3262 0.3262
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 — 30 6 4 10 0.333
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 — 9 0 1 1 0.111
2020-21 New England College D3 LittleEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23933
Forward overall
#1194
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Dixson
University of New England · 2017-18
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Hansen
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Deveny
Canton · 2013-14
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.