IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter White Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 12 2 2 4 0.333 0.0723 0.0730 0.2578 0.2604
2018-19 — CCHL 55 4 12 16 0.291 0.0631 0.0609 0.2250 0.2173
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Western New England D3 CNE SR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2022-23 Western New England D3 CNE JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Western New England D3 CNE SO 14 0 1 1 0.071
2020-21 Western New England D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47193
Forward overall
#2745
Forward born in 1999
#1399
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Yarber
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Kirkby
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Turer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.