IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Cameron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 41 9 14 23 0.561 0.0365 0.0372 0.1266 0.1289
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 13 0 2 2 0.154 0.0225 0.0231 0.0753 0.0773
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 42 6 7 13 0.309 0.0453 0.0453 0.1516 0.1516
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 23 0 1 1 0.043
2022-23 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 24 0 2 2 0.083
2021-22 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 11 1 1 2 0.182
2020-21 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43907
Forward overall
#2507
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Carson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Charron
Lake Forest · 2009-10
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Shaw
Anna Maria · 2017-18
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.