IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Koutsomitis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-12-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 45 5 14 19 0.422 0.0976 0.0991 0.3414 0.3468
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 37 12 12 24 0.649 0.1499 0.1499 0.5245 0.5245
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 20 1 4 5 0.250
2022-23 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 22 2 4 6 0.273
2021-22 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 28 6 4 10 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2021-22 · SUNY Geneseo
+321.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14766
Forward overall
#691
Forward born in 1999
#420
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Otto
St. Olaf · 2012-13
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor MacLean
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Gieseler
Adrian · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.