IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Moyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Minnesota Outlaws USPHL-Premier 11 0 6 6 0.545 0.0714 0.0735 0.1851 0.1905
2019-20 Minnesota Outlaws USPHL-Premier 43 22 25 47 1.093 0.1430 0.1430 0.3710 0.3710
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Hamline D3 MIAC GR 8 2 0 2 0.250
2022-23 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 21 2 3 5 0.238
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 18 2 0 2 0.111
2020-21 Bethel D3 MIAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17440
Forward overall
#771
Forward born in 2000
#1087
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Falivena
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stuart Harley
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Singerhouse
St. Thomas · 2008-09
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.