IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Bowlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 36 6 19 25 0.694 0.0871 0.0870 0.2192 0.2189
2019-20 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 47 11 30 41 0.872 0.1095 0.1095 0.2754 0.2754
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC — 19 2 2 4 0.210
2023-24 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SR 18 2 2 4 0.222
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 5 7 12 0.480
2022-23 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 23 5 7 12 0.522
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 11 3 2 5 0.455
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen FR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30962
Forward overall
#1648
Forward born in 1999
#1142
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pat Twombly
UMass Dartmouth · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Eoin Reager
Post · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Émile Tremblay
Westfield State · 2022-23
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.