← New Search ↗ Social Card

John McElaney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Dexter NE-Prep 29 7 11 18 0.621 0.1751 0.1751 0.2840 0.2840
2019-20 Dexter NE-Prep 30 17 10 27 0.900 0.2539 0.2539 0.4118 0.4118
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Babson D3 LittleEast 24 5 7 12 0.500
2023-24 Colby D3 NESCAC SR 25 7 11 18 0.720
2022-23 Colby D3 NESCAC JR 26 10 12 22 0.846
2021-22 Colby D3 NESCAC SO 25 7 12 19 0.760
2020-21 Colby D1 FR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Colby D3 NESCAC FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
72%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24987
Forward overall
#1162
Forward born in 2000
#271
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2006-07
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.