| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.125 | 0.0271 | 0.0291 | 0.0967 | 0.1039 |
| 2018-19 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 55 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 0.455 | 0.0986 | 0.1016 | 0.3516 | 0.3623 |
| 2019-20 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 60 | 28 | 35 | 63 | 1.050 | 0.2277 | 0.2277 | 0.8124 | 0.8124 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Plymouth State | D3 | LittleEast | — | 24 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 1.000 |
| 2023-24 | Plymouth State | D3 | LittleEast | — | 28 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0.893 |
| 2021-22 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | — | 22 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.773 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.