← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy Bowditch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Collingwood Blues OJHL 25 2 4 6 0.240 0.0588 0.0627 0.1643 0.1753
2018-19 Collingwood Blues OJHL 53 13 14 27 0.509 0.1249 0.1271 0.3487 0.3550
2019-20 Brockville Braves CCHL 54 19 21 40 0.741 0.1607 0.1607 0.5734 0.5734
2020-21 Brockville Braves CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 MIAC GR 29 8 9 17 0.586
2022-23 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 20 10 18 28 1.400
2021-22 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 26 4 12 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2021-22 · St. Olaf
+609.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32584
Forward overall
#1656
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.