← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Simon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 44 25 14 39 0.886 0.1112 0.1140 0.2798 0.2868
2019-20 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 46 25 21 46 1.000 0.1255 0.1255 0.3157 0.3157
2020-21 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 39 23 18 41 1.051 0.1319 0.1319 0.3319 0.3319
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 20 10 11 21 1.050
2023-24 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 8 7 15 0.600
2022-23 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 24 7 3 10 0.417
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 24 5 7 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2021-22 · Hamline
+412.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24091
Forward overall
#1132
Forward born in 2000
#647
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2015-16
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.