IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Maine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 49 14 25 39 0.796 0.1329 0.1375 0.3313 0.3427
2019-20 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 29 0 3 3 0.103 0.0224 0.0224 0.0800 0.0800
2020-21 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 11 1 2 3 0.273 0.0455 0.0455 0.1135 0.1135
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 4 7 11 0.440
2021-22 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2021-22 · Concordia
+273.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#50562
Forward overall
#2982
Forward born in 2000
#1212
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Todd Collins
Marian · 2005-06
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luca Esposito
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Wilson
Saint Anselm · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.